toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhat's your entirely unimportant and inconsequential hot take?message-squaremessage-square633linkfedilinkarrow-up1234arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1232arrow-down1message-squareWhat's your entirely unimportant and inconsequential hot take?toomanypancakes@crazypeople.online to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square633linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarechunes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17·5 hours agoIf it doesn’t function as a downspout, then it’s a grotesque, not a gargoyle.
minus-squareludo@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·51 minutes agoMost inconsequential opinion I’ve read yet! How often do you come into argumenta about this IRL? 😄
minus-squareSpaceCowboy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 hour agoThat’s technically true, but that Gargoyles animated show was awesome and they didn’t spit water. So under the precedent set by Bugs Bunny on the word “nimrod” the definition of gargoyle needs to be changed.
If it doesn’t function as a downspout, then it’s a grotesque, not a gargoyle.
Most inconsequential opinion I’ve read yet! How often do you come into argumenta about this IRL? 😄
That’s technically true, but that Gargoyles animated show was awesome and they didn’t spit water. So under the precedent set by Bugs Bunny on the word “nimrod” the definition of gargoyle needs to be changed.