• Jean-luc Peak-hard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    There’s a few problems with Bluesky if you’re looking for a platform that won’t eventually turn to shit.

    1. The platform is not meaningfully decentralized. With Bluesky directing its future, they have the power to do whatever they want with it, including attempting to monetize and clamp down on access.
    2. Because of point 1 above, Bluesky is able to easily censor users.
    3. To fix points 1 & 2 above you have to run the full stack: a PDS (~$5/month), relay (~$30/month), and AppView (~$300/month), which is prohibitively expensive for most people.

    Hosting your own mastodon instance, which cannot be easily blanket-censored costs ~$5 bucks a month.

    If a system is the outcome it produces, Mastodon is a platform for the people, Bluesky a platform for large orgs.

      • Jean-luc Peak-hard@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        True! But personally I’m okay with not contributing to the next facebook/Zucc or Twitter/Elmo. Long-term it’s in our best interest to build on platforms that serve us, not their creators, even if it takes them 10 years to slowly pull the rug from underneath us.