🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 13 days agoAnon's class fails expectationssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square99linkfedilinkarrow-up1510arrow-down118
arrow-up1492arrow-down1imageAnon's class fails expectationssh.itjust.works🍹Early to RISA 🧉@sh.itjust.worksM to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 13 days agomessage-square99linkfedilink
minus-squarerumschlumpel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·12 days agoAlso, duckduckgoing it, there are quite a few sources that still claim that the British Empire wasn’t profitable for the government in Britain, or regular British people, e.g.: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2598015 https://iea.org.uk/media/empire-and-slavery-did-not-make-britain-rich-finds-new-iea-book/ (I’m not that knowledgable about the quality of these particular sources, just demonstrating that the claim isn’t rare)
minus-squaregandalf_der_13te@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 days ago https://iea.org.uk/media/empire-and-slavery-did-not-make-britain-rich-finds-new-iea-book/ thanks, especially this second link seems convincing to me. they argue fairly well, with clear arguments and meaningful logical conclusions.
Also, duckduckgoing it, there are quite a few sources that still claim that the British Empire wasn’t profitable for the government in Britain, or regular British people, e.g.:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/2598015
https://iea.org.uk/media/empire-and-slavery-did-not-make-britain-rich-finds-new-iea-book/
(I’m not that knowledgable about the quality of these particular sources, just demonstrating that the claim isn’t rare)
thanks, especially this second link seems convincing to me. they argue fairly well, with clear arguments and meaningful logical conclusions.