• topperharlie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The amount of interns/students commenting “its fine/skill issue”, shows the demographic of lemmy and how comfortable people are giving stupid opinions about problems they don’t have, but are apparently experts on.

    To all of you: having the email both in inbox and calendar gives another sorting of the information, which is always a good thing. Some people might prefer removing the emails to “tidy up” inbox, but that shouldn’t make it the only option (because those people, other than OCD, probably don’t have more than 10 emails / day, with > 50 they would have give up on tidy)

    • Hal@piefed.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not the only option, I have it disabled so they stay in my inbox once accepted/declined.

        • Hal@piefed.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Damn, they lock down your Outlook settings? I don’t think I’ve ever worked anywhere that did that.

          • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            My company locks it down and deletes email older than 3 months but default unless you request a special group asking for longer storage.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              1 day ago

              Ah yes, the “it’s not evidence tampering if we just delete the stuff as a matter of course” policy.

              • forkDestroyer@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Which makes no sense to me because I could swear there’s a legal retention policy that supercedes this.

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  I presume longer retention policies apply to specific data rather than arbitrary communications. The place I worked with a 90 day deletion was maniacal about adhering to the letter of the law and they didn’t seem broadly concerned about any data that was solely in email.

                  Well until they went to sue someone else, then they’d grab and freeze all email boxes that ever communicated with the defendant and instruct all parties to immediately forward any email from that party to legal and ignore it.

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  Likely the penalty for not retaining the data is less severe than any penalty for getting caught with evidence of illegal actions, so it’s the default action to reduce risk when you’re doing illegal shit.

    • SalmonTractor@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t forget how Outlook is often “cloud” now with local message backing sometimes failing to load a message until you choose another a few times, or how Teams overlaps Outlook overlaps Teams for functionality in a terrible useless way.

      Or how selecting a message thread often doesn’t show the most recent or any of the unread messages, while clicking the unread message directly also sometimes doesn’t load it.

      Microsoft business tools are an absolute joke.

      • scutiger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The most frustrating for me is Outlook’s search functionality. I sent out purchase order emails with the PO# in the email. If I search for a number looking for my PO, I want THAT number, not a completely different number. Don’t give me the wrong number as a FIRST FUCKING RESULT!