- cross-posted to:
- europe@feddit.org
- cross-posted to:
- europe@feddit.org
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50412880
Opening up national markets has worked wonders for European railways
You must log in or register to comment.
Apparently German trains are so bad that they’re not allowed on the French network because they screwed the timetable.
That’s got to be embarrassing for the Germans, how can you be bested by the French?
Chronic underfunding
pretty sure there’s a whole bunch of history books that show italians helping germans with trains is a bad idea.
Oh right, opening our train network to competition even more is going to fix our broken rail network that suffers from decades of neglect? The very neglect the unions have critized again and again and again?
Right, that sounds totally plausible.
Privatisation always feels like a solution to shitty government services till some ultra rich company comes in, provides good service while burning cash, capturing the entire market forming a monopoly or duopoly, then raising the prices while making service shittier, and the government will say they can’t do anything now because shutting them down would mean paralyzing the entire railway of the country.
If this feels oddly specific, it’s because I’ve seen this happen with my own eyes, just not in the railway.
We’re just getting to the end of this process with our rail infrastructure in the UK. The companies have spent absolutely no money on maintenance, and now everything’s broken, and the only way to fix it is to buy everything back into public ownership, then spend a bunch of taxpayer money.
Trying to run infrastructure projects for profit is a stupid idea. The “profit” is a more dynamic economy facilitated by better transport links. It ain’t going to be in the form of cash.
Yes, this is the result of neo-capitalist policies; Deutsche Bahn has been partially privatized, which—as is always the case with this logic—means that profits flow into the pockets of billionaires while losses are borne by the general public. That is why, for example, Germany’s internet infrastructure is at the level of a Third World country, even though Telekom generates enormous revenue.
It’s the result of U.S.-style exploitative capitalism, from which we cannot break free because—just as in the U.S.—it has corrupted all the levers of power—but hey, that’s why Germany has so many billionaires compared to other countries.
Edit: That, by the way, is also why the AfD is so strong in Germany. It’s a carbon copy of MAGA and owes its popularity to the same billionaires. This party is anything but an “alternative,” as its name might lead misinformed people to believe: It embodies everything Trump stands for—corruption and unscrupulousness—and that’s putting it quite mildly.
Educate yourselves, read their party platform, and let people know what it stands for. If you don’t want an oligarchy, that’s your civic duty!
wtf is that t-mobile
Yes
It’s the economist.
Why did they not check how well privatization worked out in the UK’s rail, where one of the Labour policies had been to re-nationalise the railways since the current privatised model sucks so fucking bad?
So much for that old joke about what countries oversee what aspects of society in heaven vs hell…
The twist is we are in hell
Has anyone in Germany been on the Italian trains? I’ve done it a few times and the trains that weren’t broken were pretty dilapidated. Like the bathroom was a hole cut in the floor of the train car. That’s for the trains that weren’t broken.
This week, I spent 3.5 hours traveling 35 km. It was round trip, because the trains stopped traveling in my original direction and I had to go home. Three weeks ago, I spent six hours traveling less than 80 km.
I could literally bicycle faster. I’d be okay with a hole in the floor as long as they mounted a seat on it for handicapped riders.
