• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    First one more than a decade ago, second one about 7 years ago, definitely pre-LLM era.

    I still receive messages regularly and I don’t notice any difference from messages on the past. I answer one every now and then and it’s usually a real person. Maybe they are using LLM, but before that they just copy pasted a template and changed you name…

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Are you telling me that a human sending form messages is in any way comparable to an LLM sending messages?

      What matters is that humans used to be involved. Now they just review the results at some point. You are evaluated, chosen, further evaluated, informed, and given answers to questions you might have about a job and the company offering it all by the LLM. Everything that might theoretically be handled by agents saves the company money and let’s them cast a wider net.

      Then you’ll be end up working as a reverse centaur for some rich kid’s startup. Sure, you can spend exponentially more time than the company does verifying things or ignoring, filtering through junk… but if you are desperate, unemployed, hopeful…

      Theoretically, at least.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        A human sending copy-pasted generic messages and an LLM sending copy-pasted messages? Yeah, I don’t care.

        Fortunately, linkedin unsolicited messages cost money, so there is no mass-spam, it’s in their own interest to keep it plausibly relevant.