• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    What’s idiotic is that OpenAI broke the law, got caught, and was successful enough in turning it into a marketing stunt (aimed at investors) that other companies want to do it too.

    With this precedent, all you need to do in order to get away with hacking is to change your user agent to something an AI agent uses. /s

    • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      This is why we need personal accountability by C-suites in regards to company misgivings. Yes companies are legally entities but we need like, 50% of the accountability is shared by the C-suites either as a group, or if they have it in writing for a specific thing, by a specific one, the CEO or CTO or whatever.

      A person. So there’s a very real example of the personal risk to freedom or wealth (the second will hit investors more I presume) if you do this.

      Plus I have a feeling that the moment it’s their ass on the line, these C-fuckers will, surprisingly, agree to do this shit less often.

          • twopi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well today I learn. I was under the impression that c-suite are protected but licensed professionals get liability.

            • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s likely varies over jurisdiction. Directors often offer the CEO the opportunity to tender their resignation though when a head needs to roll.

              They all play are same golf club afterall.