• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Completely vibe-coded project it seems, even documentation. And yet:

    Human-Origin Source License

    Also love this:

    You may not, without prior written permission from the Author:

    - ship or maintain a modified version outside the contribution-purpose
      rules;
    - maintain a divergent private or internal fork;
    - port, clone, rebrand, or recreate the Covered Software;
    - create an API-compatible replacement, behavioral clone, competing
      implementation, or Derivative Implementation; or
    - use AI-assisted implementation mining to create, improve, test,
      document, or validate a Derivative Implementation.
    

    Look, I use AI too (mostly to speed things up by working on multiple items in parallel), but I’m not gonna stuff “human-origin source license” on anything I use it for, nor do I think creating API-compatible replacements, competing implementations, etc, should reasonably be possible to block with a license… Also, quite literally, he’s creating tools for reverse engineering, which in itself is generally in breach of the license of whatever software is being reverse engineered. Fuck off and use a FOSS license, whether it be permissive or copyleft…

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago
      - ship or maintain a modified version outside the contribution-purpose
        rules;
      - maintain a divergent private or internal fork;
      - port, clone, rebrand, or recreate the Covered Software;
      - create an API-compatible replacement, behavioral clone, competing
        implementation, or Derivative Implementation; 
      

      At that point why bother making your codebase public?

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      “No! Nuh uh! You can’t prompt Claude to do what it did for me, again! I did it first and called ‘dibs’ on ever doing it again!”

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Was it not ruled that API compatibility was not copyright infringement? (Oracle Vs Google.) I don’t think the last two are even enforceable.