Up to you whether you want to limit your answer to software that is possible/realistic

  • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    most of the issues with our charting software boils down to dumb shit like that - proprietary systems that are incapable of communicating, or just good ol’ fashioned garbage design

    This is everywhere. I deleted a more thought out response when I realized that someone probably handed over ALL of the backend databases of patient data to an LLM (it’s HIPAA compliant so don’t worry *wink*) so that it can spew out MORE bullshit that doesn’t work, but a lot of money was paid for it so we’re going to use it.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      HIPAA is the opposite of privacy anyway - it’s specifically about enabling sharing of data 🤦🏼.

      And it was sold as a privacy tool. Lying cocksuckers.

      • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        HIPAA is a framework for CONTROLLED sharing of data.

        Privacy = controlled sharing of data

        HIPAA has a lot of problems. But it’s not some trick.

      • pyr0ball@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        This is such a weird take. Your healthcare professionals need to be able to share your data with specialists safely and securely. That’s what HIPAA is about from my perspective, and everyone I work with. If you want effective care, you need to be able to share your medical data without fear of it leaking. The fact that people abuse the system is a separate problem