I broadly agree with Zack Polanski here. I’m glad he’s taken a stance.
I’m not sure about “no state has the right to exist”, but whatever.
I broadly agree with Zack Polanski here. I’m glad he’s taken a stance.
I’m not sure about “no state has the right to exist”, but whatever.
Disagreed. Animals have teritories, which are essentially borders. We just evolved the means to make them somewhat permanent.
Doesn’t mean we have to keep it that way for the rest of our existance as a species.
I can’t decide whether or not you actually believe that or you’re just being pseudo intellectual for the bit.
In nature animals have territories but it’s extremely common for those two shift and flow with the seasons.
But also animals don’t have internal plumbing or electricity yet we have those things, so I don’t really see why “what animals do” as being particularly relevant.
OP stated:
Please point me towards a part of our existance where we didn’t have any types of borders. I deliberatly went all the way back to our beginnings as a species to point out that even then borders existed in some form.
As for the “shift and flow” part, I clearly stated:
So, what exaclty is there pseudo-intellectual in my statement?
Edit: Here is a source to back up my claims.
Alexander C. Diener, Joshua Hagen. Borders: a very short inteoduction (2012), page 19, bottom half:
The passage isn’t very long and anybody can sail the high seas to read for themselves.
There are exceptions, as with anything in life, but it seems that borders did in fact exist since the dawn of humans.