I broadly agree with Zack Polanski here. I’m glad he’s taken a stance.
I’m not sure about “no state has the right to exist”, but whatever.
I broadly agree with Zack Polanski here. I’m glad he’s taken a stance.
I’m not sure about “no state has the right to exist”, but whatever.
That’s fair enough, my only reservation with nuclear is how much runway it needs for rollout, I know some firms have wanted to standardise with a basic unit of nuclear power sort of thing, but that’s also taking a long time. I’ve also seen promising work done in cheap grid storage, so for my money that’s going to be a better “decarbonise immediately, if not sooner” solution.
But nuclear is fine too imo, long-term. Didn’t the greens evolve slightly on that too? I think I heard they’re just going to treat it as another option to weigh on the merits, which is probably their way of saying “we’re not NIMBYs, but it doesn’t beat wind and solar”.