• new_world_odor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not a discrepancy, alcohol is processed over time. It’s her body working through the stuff in the ~30 mins or so that it presumably took to get to booking her. Yeah we can assume the levels aren’t 100% accurate but this tech is decades old so probably pretty close. There are many problems with policing; imo this isn’t one of them.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Once the cops have someone on a DUI pulled over, its probably a relief to see them blow something so high because they know they have enough time to get to the precinct for further tests.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’ve read that those portable tests on the scene aren’t super accurate. Another commentor said they aren’t generally acceptable as proof of DUI in the courts either. None of this is solid fact from research though.

      • new_world_odor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean sure but not that much, afaik the tests at the scene (for BAC, not the subjective tests) are pretty solid as far as evidence goes. In this case it probably mattered even less, blowing a .25 equates to looking pretty fucking smashed for most people so the test is basically just checking a box lmao

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          No the roadside tests are bad. They’re not very accurate, which is why you should always refuse to give one roadside. Wait until you’re at the police station.