• 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    For public transportation in the US you need medium density living. So you’re talking about getting everyone on board and uprooting everyone as you upgrade cities or build new cities for that.

    “Anything except making incremental improvements that are practical instead of doing nothing because the preferred goal is impossible, at least practically impossible” - not as catchy, I admit :P

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Oligarchs aren’t, which I only lead with because they are a huge fuckin’ part of the problem.

        We actually have huge amounts of unused housing being held to drive up prices for the rest.

        But it’s largely the wrong type of housing. Consider if you have 10,000 unhoused people, and you have 15,000 unoccupied trailers on land - but these trailers are in a remote county, miles outside the county’s main city of 6000 people. If those 10,000 unhoused families can’t find work out there and don’t have a car, it doesn’t help. An extremely stupid example to say that the current housing we have is largely not the housing we need.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Big box grocery is a big part of the problem. We’ve got a relative abundance of grocery stores here - in US terms, but that means a 2-5 mile interval between then, and who is going to walk several miles carrying groceries? It doesn’t help when competing groceries open directly across the street from each other, but even fixing that and making distribution of the current stores more even, there would still be a lot of the population 2+ miles to the nearest store, in our relatively high density suburban “core”. Get that down to a maximum of 1km from every home to the nearest grocery and you’re starting to have a walkable / bikeable solution for food.

        As for bikes, we also have near-zero practical support for biking to get your groceries - starting to get something calling itself bike lanes, but they’re not terribly safe looking, and then you get to the store and you’re extremely lucky if there’s even a rack provided to lock the bike to - the racks that do exist seem to be in direct conflict with pedestrian use of the sidewalks.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            I had a friend who had an apartment in Hamburg, roughly 600m from an S-Bahn station. within 50m of that station was the neighborhood grocery. You walk up to take the train to wherever, and on your way home you stop off in the Biergarten first, have a few, then stop in the grocery before walking home - downhill no less for the arms full of packages side of the trip. Not a bad layout, but about half the residents still had cars parked all over the streets which they used more or less daily. So, in some ways, the US arrangement just doesn’t bother with the under-utilized trains, but it also eliminates them as an option which really sucks when you want to go to the airport, or take an inter-city train somewhere…

      • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        I agree - I should have said medium mixed zoning as that’s what I was intending to convery :)

        Also, for wheelchair users like me, higher density would probably lead to cheaper delivery services of all kinds - Walmart has that market cornered at the moment, and I hate that it’s Walmart that figured it out. :|