More like fuck drivers, no?

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Public transit already exists in parts of the world and people still may need to drive there/here.

      Reducing dangers is good. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. And I can’t lug around 150kg to butt fuck nowhere.

      • Naich@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        The ideal situation would be public transport where feasible, no private cars, and you book a self-driving car when you need one to carry 150kg to butt fuck nowhere.

        • Gladaed@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Private motor vehicles are also used in commercial uses. But sure.

          Also make rentals more affordable then.

  • mrfriki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    No cars and better public transportation would do the trick as well and no greedy billionaire would be involved.

    • Gladaed@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 days ago

      Public infrastructure is a billion dollar industry. Train Barons have been a thing too.

  • 😀🚲@urbanists.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Self-driving cars are great for the rentiers, and worse for everyone else. As bad as it is to rent your car loan and mortgage and fuel supply, supposedly you can finish paying for those loans. Soon you’ll get to rent oxygen from Elon, it’ll be swell.

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    To offset the ones it causes, surely?

    Be absolutely sure that a self-driving car will not hesitate to kill you if it means saving someone it deems more important.

    If there’s an inevitable crash between a typical passenger car with one adult driver and a bus with 35 children, and the crash can either result in the death of the adult driver, or injuries to all 35 kids, I’m pretty sure the car is going to let you take that L. And maybe as a society we would want that, for some anonymous stranger to die so that 35 kids won’t be harmed. It’s an easy trolley problem until the one person is someone you know, love, depend on, or whatever. What if they’re the sole caregiver for a special needs child who will be put into the system and systematically abused, just so a few dozen kids could avoid some scrapes and bruises. Then it gets more complicated, but the self-driving car isn’t going to consider all that.

    We shouldn’t care about one vs two or more others, but we do if the one is us.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      As a bicyclist, I back da fuck up real far when I see a waymo coming. I’m not gambling my life that their data set gives a shit about bikes.