No. No you do not. You need to force your local governments to campaign for better public transport and infrastructure.

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I agree.

    Rural public transport could absolutely be way better, especially if it was viewed as a public service, not a business.

    There’s plenty of places where even an optimised solution would mean cars aren’t needed.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Question is to cover rural communities as-is, do you and up practically replacing every car on the road with a bus? Bus is generally only better if you have significantly fewer of them to scale.