I replied to someone saying that the USSR defeated the Nazis saying that it was a group effort. Got into an argument and called a Nazi repeatedly because “I was mad that the USSR defeated the Nazis and hated them for it” which is ridiculous. This isn’t the first time that’s happened on Lemmy. What’s up with that?

  • Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Don’t take it personal. There are some deep Tankie holes on Lemmy, primarily .lm, they’d even take offense if you were suggesting, that maybe not absolutely everything is splendid in North Korea and I am not kidding or exaggerating here.

    • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are some deep Tankie holes on Lemmy

      Deep Tankie Holes are what I’m calling my Lemmy moderator themed porno

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I like hexbear’s cute pictures. They, unfortunately, do not like me. That’s okay, it is their instance to run after all. They should run it how they want.

        Its not like they purposely built a secret ban list in server hosting software and tried to hide it from the people who downloaded it.

          • cm0002@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Fr, I despise the Tankie devs authoritarianism, but at the very least they don’t do some shady reddit corpo shit with their code (for the most part)

    • webadict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      They are so weird there. They were arguing that North Korea is definitely not an authoritarian regime and also definitely not starving their citizens or some stupid shit, and one of them started yelling about how I probably believed North Koreans all had the same haircut because of the mainstream media, which I… didn’t, but I said if they did, it wouldn’t be crazy because they have less diverse media to access, but also that wouldn’t have anything to do with why North Korea’s government is bad, but I was just so confused why they were mad about it.

  • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Mods on Lemmy are like the mods on reddit but on steroids. They’ll ban you for completely petty nonsense.

  • Latuga17@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I got in an argument because someone there claimed the only reason the holocaust is commemorated is to support zionism and I said that there might be other reasons too to commemorate a genocide. Then I made a negative comment about put in the same thread and it was deleted immediately.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Oh gosh, any snarky comments about the reality of China and the fact that they are pumping out more billionaires than the US always gets deleted on ML.

    They are fucking delusional and ignore all evidence that challenges their bizarre viewpoints. When it comes to Russia they are even worse. They are not wrong about Russia doing the heavy lifting in WWII, but they are definitely being assholes about it.

    Whenever I am on Lemmy and noticed someone being very passive aggressive around politics you can almost guarantee they are from ML.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have found that if u make a legitimate argument backed by facts that are irrefutable, the mod will ban you and delete all your comments for breaking from their echo chamber. Decided to return the favor for their whole instance so I no longer have the misfortune of seeing any of the drivel on their communities. Sucks because there was a couple I enjoyed despite the tankies, but there’s much better alternative communities on other instances that won’t kick u out for having a differing opinion. .ml/hexbear basically = authoritarian cuck, it’s like the communist version of Trump supporters as weird as that sounds.

    • late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Whenever I am on Lemmy and noticed someone being very passive aggressive around politics you can almost guarantee they are from ML.

      I have also noticed this a few weeks ago. I don’t know whats with the snarky, ignorant, immature attitude, but its always .ml

  • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah. Welcome to lemmy.ml

    Many of us just block all the communities of lemmy.ml. this way you are out of reach of the tankie mods.

    Unfortunately, lemmy.ml is one of the big instances, so you’re also cutting a big chunk of Lemmy content. But if enough people join the ml boycott (there are already a lot of people that block ml), eventually ml will shrink and other more sensible instances will prevail.

    • cm0002@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Actually, according to lemmyverse.net (great place for comm discovery btw!) and my own experience cross posting .ml content, .ml is almost entirely held up by a core set of the most diehard tankie users. Most .ml comms are overshadowed by comms on other instances with much higher Monthly Active Users numbers.

      The comm search field goes by pure subscriber count which doesn’t really decrease for any reason other than a user actually unsubscribing from a comm so all of those insane numbers on some .ml comms are just overinflated and don’t reflect actual traffic. It’s full of dead and/or banned accounts, alts and some still active users

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not in a Marxist website. Notice how my name doesn’t end in “Lemmy.ml”, “Lemmygrad.org” or “hexbear.net”. :)

        Also Marxist and tankie is not the same thing. I could be a Marxist and still call out the boot licking tankieness going on in .ml

          • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            A tankie did. But Lemmy is not a website. You were talking about websites. The website my account is in is lemmy.world. which is not run by tankies. And tankies do not have any moderation power. Why would a non-tankie avoid a website that is not run or moderated by tankies?

            I just see a lot of tankies because Lemmy is a federated system, and one of the big instances is controlled by tankies. I can just block that instance’s communities (as I already do) and move on with my life without being fed tankie-curated-and-moderated content.

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I guess all that lend lease equipment we used to prop up the weak soviet industry had nothing to do with it. They thanked us by making a clone of the B-29.

  • cm0002@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s just the admins of lemmy.ml for ya, here’s a megathread on them

    You’ll get banned for showing support for Ukraine or going against Russian narratives or if you remind them of Putlers promise to not invade or just shit talking Putler in general

    Or calling out propaganda sites - https://lemmy.world/post/32776038 | https://lemmy.world/post/33416433 | https://lemmy.world/post/34051329 | https://lemmy.world/post/35919522

    Or so much more, I actually haven’t updated the megathread in a few months, but there’s more recent stuff on !meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

    ETA - Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input “lemmy.ml” and apply And consider donating to individual instances instead.

    • Konkyer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      3 days ago

      Why anyone would trust anything you say I’ve no idea. Your posts are all very much made up narratives.

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, why trust them? Trust the public modlogs that they linked instead!

        Or, ya know, keep ignoring what’s right in front of you, put your fingers in your ears and screech like a child. You seem good at that.

      • cm0002@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 days ago

        Each and every post includes:

        • As much screenshots as possible to capture the full context (Tankies do love to complain that critics never have the full context after all)

        • Links to the modlog and source post wherever possible

        Titles are just a summary or interpretation, as is every article you’ve ever read. The full evidence is available for you to post your own interpretation if you feel mine is wrong.

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah like others have said they don’t like people saying bad things about China or Russia. I’m banned from a few places for saying jack ma (founder of ali-baba) was disappeared for re-education since he used to be a huge critic of the Chinese government, went missing for like a week, then came back and suddenly started praising the Chinese government and thats not even a little sus?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    This isn’t the first time that’s happened on Lemmy. What’s up with that?

    It was lemmy.ml/worldnews…

    https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=24410054

    If you go to settings you should be able to block an entire instance and then won’t see them on /all

    There’s a couple instances that always moderate like that. But you’re better off just hanging out, finding out for yourself, and then blocking what you don’t agree with.

    But there’s another that bans people for downvoting AI, but only for a few days so people come back to be trolled. And at least one that bans anyone who tries to take anything seriously.

    Stop looking at Lemmy as a single thing, there are dozens of instances acting largely autonomously and if one fucks up, make sure you call out that one and not the entire fediverse.

    • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      If you go to settings you should be able to block an entire instance and then won’t see them on /all

      Thanks

      Stop looking at Lemmy as a single thing, there are dozens of instances acting largely autonomously and if one fucks up, make sure you call out that one and not the entire fediverse.

      Fair enough. The way Lemmy works is kinda confusing.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        You know how multiplayer games can have different servers with different rules and people? Same thing.

      • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Just remember to block .ml and you should be fine! Not many others ban you for speaking.

  • Mandarbmax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ya the guys in Lemmy.ml tend to be pretty weird like that. They aren’t a monolith but in general they tend to think that Russia, China, and North Korea have never done anything bad and that all the evil in the world comes from capitalism in europe and America and that the whole world will be fixed when The Revolution comes. It is all sort of like evangelical Christianity with the numbers filed off, the president of the United States is like an appointed satan (appointed, not elected, they don’t believe elections work/are real in the west) who rules over hell which is the west (sometimes stylized as “Amerikkka”, often accompanied by an American flag emoji with a fire emoji on top of it or a jpeg of a Chinese emperor shooting a fireball), Karl Marx is sort of like Jesus and mao, lenin, Stalin, etc. are the disciples, and The Revolution is the rapture. It is a pretty interesting belief system and I think the .ml guys all mean well, but they can be really difficult to talk to sometimes, as you’ve seen.

    • trainsrkool@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      67
      ·
      4 days ago

      thats because its true, if you left your liberal echo chamber and read real news and read theory properly it would all make sense 😒

      • Devial@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Yeah, it’s totally true, everyone knows the only member of the allied forces was actually the USSR. No other country fought against the Nazis, they did completely single handedly, and totally wouldn’t have just sat there and let it happen, if Hitler hadn’t violated their non aggression pact first.

    • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      4 days ago

      No they didn’t. If a non-aggression pact allowing Nazi annexation of territory is equivalent to an alliance, then France and Britain allied with the Nazis multiple times before the Soviets. There is a reason about how the only non-aggression pact that you hear about is Molotov-Ribbentrop pact and not the Munich Agreements or the Franco-German Declaration, etc. The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact came out of the Soviets being turned down multiple times by France and Britain to forming an anti-fascist alliance.

      This is the selective remembrance of appeasement. It is ignored that that encompassed many non-aggression pacts with the Nazis and is only remembered to selectively invoke for war hawking. If we say a nation is evil, than not being on board with a war of aggression is actually evil (Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, etc.) and you are just like Chamberlain, whose only motivation was being a pussy. You can discuss the morality or effectiveness, but Molotov-Ribbentrop was to try to delay the war for preparation and that the Nazis wouldn’t be stupid enough to start a war without their own oil and steel supplies and without preventing a possibility of a two front war with France/Britain, and the Soviets were caught flat-footed because of overestimating the rationality of the Nazis. There was also the worry that France and Britain might eventually join the Nazis since they were pretty vocal about fascism being a possible necessary evil as it is the most extreme form of anti-communism, even though the attempt of appeasement was trying to sit out an eventual war between the Nazis and USSR, since Judeo-Bolshevism was a thing Nazis believed before they even took power.

      • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Britain didn’t invade a country and split it with the Nazis lmao. They were hardly good guys (just ask the Bengalis), but they didn’t form an offensive alliance with literally Hitler.

        • RmDebArc_5@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Wasn’t Czechoslovakia (partially) split between the Nazis and Poland similar to how the Soviets initially split Poland with the Nazis? Not sure what Britain did in that direction, but this what I have heard from someone living/formerly living in the Czech republic

          • YeOldGrim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 days ago

            No. While an utterly shitty PR move for the time, Poland took a 801.5 km2 piece of the highly disputed territory, which was previously in a dramatic tug war between both countries, to a level that Czechoslovakia took it during the Polish-Soviet war.

            It shouldn’t have happened, it was an idiotic move for Poland even at the time and played right into Nazi propaganda…

            Which you are repeating now, 87 years later. Who says it’s the victors that write history…

            It was not “similar to how the Soviets initially split Poland with the Nazis”. Not even close. But UNLIKE Russia (that considers itself seemlingly the heir to the USSR), Poland history and multiple figures acknowledged that it was stupid and shameful.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          4 days ago

          It’s a lie that USSR-Germany made any agreement to split Poland. USSR liberated it before Germany could take control of the east.

          • Hemuphone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Hahahaha the history books you are reading are wild. I assume Finland also started the winter war?

          • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            No, the USSR did agree to take Eastern Poland in Molotov-Ribbentrop, but they did wait until after the Nazis took the western part before starting their invasion. A combination of waiting to see if Poland could fight off the Nazis, meaning that they didn’t have to worry about further Nazi expansion, and after that moving the border west to provide more territory needing to be taken in an eventual war with Germany.

            • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              20
              ·
              4 days ago

              Secret protocol agreement may have existed, or the forgery backed up by 1990s Russia cozying up to west and joining Stalin derangement syndrome unanimity.

              Still, the USSR did not encourage/applaud a nazi controlled Warsaw, and weather Germany could take entire country or not, would have been easier to buy tolerance for nazi controlled Warsaw. Requiring a defensive buffer proved prescient. “If you want a pact, accept us taking Warsaw”

              • “May have existed”?

                Molotov himself inadvertently implied their existence numerous times in his conversations with Chuev (Molotov Remembers; Molotov-Chuev interviews between 1970-1986, published 1993).

                Khrushchev acknowledged their existence in his memoirs, which nobody disputes the provenance of, and which were published in the West in the 1970s.

                The CPSU itself acknowledged their existence at the end of 1989, and published their copy of the text in their official journal.

                The literal Soviet documents, held by the General Department of the CPSU Central Committee, were located after the archives were declassified in 1992, and have since been published widely.

                No party seems to dispute the existence of the secret protocols. If you have a single credible source that does, feel free to cite them.

                • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Ok. Very likely existed. I was unaware of Kruschev/Molotov acknowledgements. Doesn’t affect modern nazi mischaracterization that pact, even with that compromise, constitutes any semblence of an alliance between the 2 powers.

        • radio_free_asgarthr@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          4 days ago

          While it is not justifying it, but is that really a major distinction. The purpose of several previous non-aggression pacts was to sign off on Nazi territorial annexation (again, selectively remembered with appeasement) of saying “it is okay to take the Sudetenland” and “We wont use the Anschluss as a Causus Belli”. The reason the Soviets took the eastern part of Poland was to push the border west and that they felt that they could justify this by the fact that it was part of the Russian Empire and Soviet Russia during the revolution and that it was lost to get peace in WW1. That does not justify it, just that any talk about the Soviets, rather than France and Britain, being more compromised and accommodating to the Nazis or that the Soviets were more pro-Nazi than the West is demonstrably wrong and rewritting history for cold war reasons.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        Lol please just shut up with your rewriting of history. No one is going to listen to your braindead ruzzian take on how the USSR was the good guys.