I replied to someone saying that the USSR defeated the Nazis saying that it was a group effort. Got into an argument and called a Nazi repeatedly because “I was mad that the USSR defeated the Nazis and hated them for it” which is ridiculous. This isn’t the first time that’s happened on Lemmy. What’s up with that?

  • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 days ago

    Sure, if you ignore North Africa, Western Europe, and the Pacific Theatre.

    27 million to 1.7 million losses in all theaters. the eastern front was 70-80% of the entire german war effort. The lend lease didn’t even arrive in significant amounts until after the battle for stalingrad.

    the original comment you replied to that started this off was this:

    they [the US] didn’t win wwii, the soviets did.

    you have managed to really move the goalposts in your pity thread

    • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      The USSR having no concern for their own fighting men is not a plus towards this argument. Germany lost 3-4 million on that front. 3-4 million in comparison to 27 million shows that the Soviet strategy of throwing wave after wave of bodies was a bad strategy.

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        the 27 million includes approximately 16-19 million civilians who were systematically exterminated or died under occupation.

        blaming soviet military strategies for those deaths is historically illiterate. the nazi invasion was explicitly genocidal in intent, those civilians weren’t casualties of soviet tactics.

        • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          Okay? That still doesn’t mean that the Soviets won the war singlehandedly, which is the argument that was being made. Around 11 million Soviet soldiers and sailors were lost. The only excuse for that is strategy. Losing 11 million to 4 million is , frankly, awful and the only reason they didn’t lose completely was that they had the numbers.

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Losing 11 million to 4 million is , frankly, awful and the only reason they didn’t lose completely was that they had the numbers.

            soviet POWs were systematically murdered rather than held as prisoners. this was a war of extermination and qualitatively different from every other theater. very different from conventional warfare, a significant portion (on the order of 3+ million) of those ‘military’ deaths were just starving or working prisoners to death.

            • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              And that’s fucking awful, it still doesn’t mean that the Soviets, and only the Soviets won the war.

                • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  “the US didn’t win the war, the Soviets did”

                  You’ve quoted that to me twice as if I responded that the US won the war, which I never did. I said it was a group effort because it was. You seem to think it was only a European war and not a world war. Do we need to break down the Pacific theater now and break down the contributions there? Or can you accept the fact that the World War was a group effort?

          • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            7 days ago

            the person you replied to said:

            they [the US] didn’t win wwii, the soviets did.

            the original claim was not that the soviets won single-handedly. they were responsible for taking on 70-80% of the german war effort.

              • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                7 days ago

                Too bad the axis was made up of more than Germany.

                even accounting for all axis partners, the eastern front absorbed the vast majority of axis military capacity throughout the war.

                the original claim was not that the soviets won single-handedly, from what i can tell it was that the US did not.

                • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zipOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  the original claim was not that the soviets won single-handedly, from what i can tell it was that the US did not.

                  “The US didn’t win the war, the Soviets did”. You’ve quoted it to me twice now.