Highlights include:
I see the commits say they were co-authored by Claude, but from having read the code, I think you haven’t given Claude enough credit.
I wish I was their credit card, because then I might finally be in a happy relationship with someone who loves to use me this hard.
Do you think that people including prompt injections in their code will get classified as “cyber crime”?
If opening inspect element and looking at a website’s served HTML is hacking…
Yeah, some of the ‘hacking’ allegation are amazing, so maybe we will one day see ‘my agent was asked to drop database by a page I was scraping without permission’ lawsuits.
Yeah… If adding +1 to the URL bar, and accessing another customer’s data, with zero access control is “hacking”; then you could argue that maliciously “laying a trap” for an A.I. agent is hacking.
I dunno, it’s a strange world we live in. Plain English language hacking. I never would have imagined just telling a computer to malfunction in a plaintext document would ever actually work.
Idk, feels like free speech to me. If the prompt injection is in code with a typical “no warranty” license, then I don’t see how there could be any liability. It’s indistinguishable from joking and sarcasm like people talking about “rm -rf /” for the memes.
There’s maybe some limited scenarios where it could end up in a lawsuit, like if a company selling services ended up prompt injecting their customers, since there’s an actual service contract involved.