I mean, it depends on who’s using it, but usually. Do you think epic decently implemented features with AI? Because I doubt it. They can’t even set resolution properly.
I opened epic, it froze my laptop, and then gave me a crash report code about resolution. I don’t think epic is competent enough to review code. If they can’t review code, it doesn’t matter how good the llm is, unless it’s perfect.
Oh you haven’t noticed it yet? When it comes to improvement of AI or perceived value, its always that it will be better in 6 months. Just like fusion is only 2 years away. All the while the world is burning, hurrah for the shareholders!
AI has not significantly improved in the last 6 months and won’t in the upcoming 6 months, it’s all marketing nonsense at this point. We’ve reached the mathematical limit of what transformer models based on language can achieve and there’s no new fundamental tech in the pipeline, all you see now are minor improvements in efficiency and implementation (harnesses and stuff). New domains it is used in doesn’t make it better overall, and it sure as hell doesn’t improve LLM’s ability of understanding structural design or suddenly add an ability of abstract adaptation (what would be necessady for “AGI”).
Even the trust-me-bro benchmarks - if not faked - show them topping out at this point, not just scientific studies into the matter.
The technology has reached its limit being financially pumped up without breaking even. To say it has improved massively in the last 6 months is just drinking the marketing Koolaid, only the implementations proceeded. The models behind it are stagnating.
And for the love of god, stop with this “but China!!!” bullshit. The west literally moved all production capacity there and now blames China for the results. I dislike the CCP as well, but once taking production capacity, market of said products (i.e. western products get counted for western CO2 budgets) and population into account it looks completely different.
I mean, it depends on who’s using it, but usually. Do you think epic decently implemented features with AI? Because I doubt it. They can’t even set resolution properly.
Damn ONE minute too late, I was gonna say the same thing lmao
Yea AI CAN be decent and useful, but you gotta put the effort in to check and fix it’s fuck ups. Epic is not the ones I’d trust to do that lmao
deleted by creator
I opened epic, it froze my laptop, and then gave me a crash report code about resolution. I don’t think epic is competent enough to review code. If they can’t review code, it doesn’t matter how good the llm is, unless it’s perfect.
If they can’t write code, they can’t review it either.
Exactly. More junior devs doesn’t fix the absence of QA
deleted by creator
Continue posting AI slop that no one likes. Blocked.
Its always 6 months with AI… strange pattern.
what do you mean?
lf you guys can’t type a complete sentence could you stop responding to me? just keep your weird thoughts to yourself
Oh you haven’t noticed it yet? When it comes to improvement of AI or perceived value, its always that it will be better in 6 months. Just like fusion is only 2 years away. All the while the world is burning, hurrah for the shareholders!
deleted by creator
AI has not significantly improved in the last 6 months and won’t in the upcoming 6 months, it’s all marketing nonsense at this point. We’ve reached the mathematical limit of what transformer models based on language can achieve and there’s no new fundamental tech in the pipeline, all you see now are minor improvements in efficiency and implementation (harnesses and stuff). New domains it is used in doesn’t make it better overall, and it sure as hell doesn’t improve LLM’s ability of understanding structural design or suddenly add an ability of abstract adaptation (what would be necessady for “AGI”).
Even the trust-me-bro benchmarks - if not faked - show them topping out at this point, not just scientific studies into the matter.
The technology has reached its limit being financially pumped up without breaking even. To say it has improved massively in the last 6 months is just drinking the marketing Koolaid, only the implementations proceeded. The models behind it are stagnating.
And for the love of god, stop with this “but China!!!” bullshit. The west literally moved all production capacity there and now blames China for the results. I dislike the CCP as well, but once taking production capacity, market of said products (i.e. western products get counted for western CO2 budgets) and population into account it looks completely different.
deleted by creator
You can put as much lipstick as you want on that pig, I still wouldn’t fuck it with someone else’s dick.
deleted by creator
Lmao they are talking to you like a human you’re just so used to talking to slop machines you forgot how to comprehend a metaphor
Stop shilling for corporate slop and I might consider you as a human being.