• gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    what i kinda don’t get about this whole thing … is that kinda, in other countries (look at the middle east), they get bombed daily and none of you bats an eye (well, some do, but still, this has been going on for 50 years and i hardly ever hear anyone talking about it). meanwhile you get one terrorist attack and everyone’s supposed to lose their minds over this.

      • Starya67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I lost 14 colleagues and none of them were American. Was the response overblown? Yes. But it’s called the “World” Trade center for a reason.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The US never gets attacked. There’s an ally to the north, an ally to the south, and two big fucking oceans to the east and west. So, when it does happen, it’s a pretty big deal.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      People outside the US dont care or aren’t expected to care about 9/11. Americans are loud and own the platforms so it seems like the entire world but its really just them treating the entire internet like an American fourm.

      People in NZ still schzio out about a French terrorist attack that happened to us 40 years ago. I still see news bring it up.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      America has been punching and kicking countless countries since WWII, causing thousands if not millions of deaths (Iraqi “freedom” alone caused like 300.000 Iraqi deaths IIRC) and the second that somebody punches back and gives them a bloody nose its all crying and needing to make 50 movies about the heroes of that day, and of course it was immediately used to implement the “patriot” act (hint, it has shit to do with patriotism and everything with making the IS an autocratic state)

      I get it, of course. For the individuals that died or were injured that day, it’s a tragedy, but as a country? They completely deserved it and much, much more

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do you think maybe there’s a way to phrase that where you’re not saying that 2,000 innocent people deserved to die?

        • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          How about “The worlds most advanced military power allowed 2000 deaths to occur, all to further allow its parent state to tighten restrictions on free movement, increase surveillance on innocent civilians, and garner support for an invasion of an unrelated country?”