• Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    2 days ago

    Clearly a professional agreed that it didn’t just look rough, the shit was damaged

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Firstly, they’ll repair and/or make any guitar look better. It’s their job so they’ll do it. Secondly and more importantly, it isn’t about if the guitar is damaged or not. It was clearly loved for what it was, it was probably more about the history of it than anything else.
      It’s really not hard to not fuck with other peoples stuff without their consent. And it’s real sad that people like you exist that don’t seem to understand that.

      • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        2 days ago

        It absolutely is about whether the guitar was damaged or not, that’s extremely relevant information and you’re trying to disregard it because that’s the only way you have any chance of not sounding like a complete fucking moron

        • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve got a guitar with a damaged mid pickup, I picked it up for a song, it roughs up the sound something bad, but the thing is that for what I use it to play that roughness helps give me the tone I’m looking for. I have an old Crate amp that inches closer to the end with every session, and its garbled death rattles add precisely what I want to the sound.

          Standardization is for hacks. You don’t get to decide what other people are looking for out of their art.

          And just for posterity, what do you play?

    • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s not enough context here to say that with any certainty. If husband was playing it and enjoying it, then it’s doing the job it needs to. Even if it was actually broken and actually fixed, it still changes the relationship between player and instrument and could’ve easily taken away earned character as a way to make it look “nice”

      • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t have a lot of sympathy for the idea of damage as character or lack of maintenance for a musical instrument as an aesthetic decision rather than just a bad decision, but you’re right about there not being enough information

            • JeSuisUnHombre@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Because it’s more valuable as is

              I don’t even mean monetary value (though that’s also true, you don’t refinish a vintage guitar because you halve the selling price), but the historical value and sentimental value and enjoyment value. It’s a record of the time he’s put in on it and the dedication to this instrument. That means something, more than “fixing” it ever could.

            • bstix@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Willie did try taking it to a repair shop one time when his regular luthier was unavailable. They refused to touch it, because they were afraid of fixing something that shouldn’t be fixed.