I mean, I’ve wanted to talk deep with people, but I realised what I considered talking deep feels stupid talk when you’re not in the zone.

Like, people say they wanna talk about space and stuff, but there’s scientists already doing that, and in a more meaningful way.

Like, I can’t understand what I even want at this point. That feel of talking deep with someone, but when I actually think of talking about it, it sounds like I was high. Like what kinda deep talk can a average guy like me can even have?

  • Secret_Music@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I would say it’s a subjective thing. Looking back at friendships that I had along the way, “deep and meaningful” conversations happen when you’ve sparked with each other enough to let the walls down and just talk about life, the universe without worrying that you sound like you’re high or whatever.

    So I don’t think it’s something that can be forced either. It just happens when you meet someone on the same wavelength as you. Easier to come across in real life than social media because no one really talks one on one on social media. Or it’s rare. Reddit style platforms are generally good for the ‘deep’ part but not the connection part.

  • tigermountain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    To me, “deep talk” is discussing things like Susan Sontag’s book On Photography, Thomas Mann’s The Magic Mountain or Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico Philosophicus . What you’re describing is actually the curiosity and openness and the willingness to think about things. That’s fantastic.

  • ArseAssassin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Deep talk rises more from questions and openness to considering different options than it does from having the broadest knowledge of a topic. It’s about asking why instead of accepting the popular narrative about a subject. Following the scientific method doesn’t really make someone’s understanding of a topic deep. Propagating wide sets of data to confirm hypotheses about the natural world is a fairly mechanical process on to itself.

  • Windex007@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s all relative.

    My 2 year old was sitting on the toilet and was like “sometimes, you just have to let the poop out”.

    Hell yeah.

  • ytsedude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    IMHO, you need two things for “deep talk”: authenticity and vulnerability. You can’t have that level of connection without both individuals bringing those to the table. I, personally, don’t get to that level flippantly–only with people I know and trust can reciprocate. If you try to force it, you get the opposite: shallowness.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I have one friend who I occasionally get into deep topics with, and it’s usually a gradual thing - talking about light stuff that gets more and more deep.

    I will sometimes get into moderately deep discussions on the internet like here on Lemmy. Sometimes people (more on reddit than here) are like “lol tl;dr” and such bullshit, but I try to ignore those people.

    So it depends on whether or not you want deep discussions in person with someone you know well, or if just discussion in general is sufficient, in which case, you can be the change you want to see - to some degree. Put it out there and often it’ll be ignored but not always.

    space and stuff […] more meaningful

    Oh, that’s not a concern. Deep discussion allows us to work through topics with feedback from soneone else, to give and take ideas, just to even be excited deeply about some particular topic. It doesn’t have to have any specific value to be worth it.

    Look for the places where discussion happens and if it interests you, jump in. It won’t always work, but sometimes it does.

    For that matter, there’s folks like me who are generally chatty (depending on mood and fatigue level). Anything strike your fancy recently? I or someone else might bite. I like discussing lots of random things, though there’s also a lot that just doesn’t draw my attention. heh. But if you wanna give it a go, why not? :)

    But also, finding things to submit, or thinking of good discussion questions to submit to this community, can be good conversation starters. Especially if you indicate you’re interested in longer discussions. May not work every time still, but it’s a good method.

  • flamingo_pinyata@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are you interested in?

    Sharing your current hyperfocus can work well, but you have to introduce it gradually. Don’t infodump. Introduce the subject a few times superficially until you become known as “the guy who’s into X”. Then as some point you will be asked to explain. That’s your moment!

    If you’re more into discussing philosophy and meaning of life, you need to wait for a correct setting. You mentioned it yourself. It usually includes consuming some kind of substances, but even if you don’t it’s that kind of vibe. Put yourself into “afterpaty” situations. When you do some activity (not necessarily a party) and then stay to hang out with the same people.

    • cinoreus@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot of things interest me, especially the ones that are both technical and capture my imagination. Recently I have been really curious about animal communication, but also I had sparks of Interests in very different things, like Athen’s sortition democracy.

      • Eq0@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sharing interests is both deep and interesting to the right crowd! Randomly spitting factoids is usually neither… so format and engagement matter a lot in this context. Also consider that some people are generally interested in random topics, others really not so much, so select your crowd.

  • shartgargle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    A little bit goes a long way. Try to sprinkle it in randomly instead of sitting down and saying “let’s deep talk for a while” because it feels like an uncomfortable meeting. That kind of talk has to come naturally, or at least feel natural to get in the vibe for it. It’s in the same vein as a stranger blindsiding you with politics, it feels forced and is off-putting if unprepared for it.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think you’re describing an in depth discussion. What makes the talk deep isn’t having complicated subject matter. It’s when your talking about things you feel to your core.

    The deep part is emotional not philosophical.

  • Trump Rapes Kids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Most people don’t seem very interested in deep philosophical conversations. It distracts them from trying to focus on Love Island.

  • untorquer@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Look at the fast friends procedure and use those prompts as inspiration for questions.

    Facts can be looked up but our experience of them can not. Experience is interesting and deepness is often the feeling of connecting with someone emotionally through sharing that experience.

    Be curious about people’s experience. Ask them about theirs.

    What does living on a mote of dust floating alone through the great emptiness mean to you? Or my current favorite after basic intros, or even with people I’ve known a long time, “Who are you?”.

          • untorquer@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            God that’s relatable, sorry about the childhood LMAO. Ever figure out the whole emotions thing?

            • AskewLord@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Oh I never bought into their bullshit. I don’t get catholic stereotypes because well, I ignored all the stupid crap my parents tried to teach me.

              my childhood mostly sucked not because we were catholic, but because we were poor and my parents were very angry about it everyday. they probably would have been happier had they actually gone to church more often.