• terranoid@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    So basically the DM created a world with a natural disaster incoming, and the players decided to instead destroy the indigenous nation, install a new puppet leader that adheres to Western values and voting rights, and ensure gay marriage is legalized even though homosexuality was tolerated in this society, just marriage was a civil and financial issue and not necessarily related.

    Who’s worse? The DM, or the imperialist players?

    Literally doing the same shit the CIA would, and people wonder why this shit happens. It’s a bunch of fucks who think that their Western values translate to every culture and is more important than respecting their sovereignty.

    • anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      “The population rising up against authority and for social progress is clearly colonialism from beyond the force wall”, is certainly one of the takes of all time.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        you realize the main justification for colonialism was ‘we will bring our culture and values to these backwards societies’, right?

        it’s only social progress to you.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            social progress is relative to the social goals.

            for a western society? yeah, for non-western societies? no.

            the problem is everyone assumes ‘society’ must believe in the western ideals of individualistic freedom. there is no reason it must or should.

            plenty of people have ideals that are not about freedom, they are about control. for those folks, gay civil rights are anti-progress.

            • apprehensivecrab1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              “Local leftist decides that gay people shouldn’t have human rights because gay human rights don’t comport with the social progress related to non-western societies” is my favorite example of horseshoe theory in action. Please never break containment.

              • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Nah, according to lemmy politics I’m right wing nazi who wants to kill/convert all gay people. because I read the harry potter books 10 years ago. You got it wrong.

                but please feel free to mischaracterize everything I said however it makes you feel most morally superior? you got that part right.

                your inability to see the world from other perspectives than your own personal one is your problem, not mine. one of the core beliefs of identity politics is that this isn’t possible at all, which is why people who believe in it literally can’t comprehend anyone else who is different than them culturally or socially as anything other than evil. because their tribe is the only good people in all of the world.

    • Xerxos@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Oh, please. The CIA would never interfere because of social values. If there is oil involved, or the interests of a big American company, though…

    • FavouriteShapes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I really like your interpretation

      Also if we step out of that for a second, I was confused that some people in the comments were mad at the DM/narrator of this story. The question of whether he’s the one being an obtuse meanie is really down to what the groups’ dynamics are;

      • do they know each other well enough to completely goof off his premise and instead have a meme campaign? Then DM is wrong.
      • are they meeting for the first or second time? Then they’re disregarding the work DM did to plan a campaign, and are in the wrong.

      It feels pretty shit when you just want to share something with people and they sideline or walk over it for something else.

      That’s why your interpretation works really well - much like the CIA they are disrupting an existing culture/status-quo and betraying the trust first shown towards them, when fostering a reciprocal relationship could be more effective to achieving their goals. Meta-Imperialism

    • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      14 days ago

      what a wild and cynical world you must live in. Just divorced from any joy or whimsy… have fun making everyone around you feel awkward…

      • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        14 days ago

        How dare you infer I have no whimsy. Motherfucker I am chock full of whimsy and joy.

        What is more whimsical, enjoying a fresh new world for what it is and exploring it and accepting their differences that you may not fully understand, or asking if it has gay marriage and democracy and destroying it if it does not already reflect your neoliberal values?

        • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          Just because neoliberals tolerate gay people doesn’t mean that gay rights are inherently neoliberal. Democracy, maybe, but we don’t know if they were doing elections with unlimited campaign spending by property owners or if they were voting in workers’ councils. Classical Athens, the United States, the PRC, the DPRK, and the Republic of Ireland all have/had democracies in some sense, but they vary massively in implementation, and anyone who calls all of those neoliberal is either very confused or not being sincere.

          Furthermore, trying to change the world is central to nearly any RPG. A crusade to obtain human rights doesn’t prohibit whimsy or enjoyment, but when you do the fantasy equivalent of traveling to modern Gaza to organize a festival, you shouldn’t be terribly surprised when you get a bad ending regardless of whether you accomplish your goal.

          Also, there’s no indication that the player characters were outsiders in the first place. You’re characterizing them as invaders, but this could have been an internal proletarian uprising.