Driving between them takes 5 minutes in a straight line. Safely walking between them, however, is a six-hour diversion through four unrelated towns, as opposed to the 30 or so minutes it would take in a straight line. Thanks to hostile architecture, I guess.

  • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah I mean just take a walk in pretty much any town or city in the US* and you will quickly see how everything was designed only with cars in mind and just the smallest nod to pedestrians. Like for anything more than crossing the street it is abysmal.

    • There are some walkable areas but they are a fairly rare exception
  • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What is the straight short line between the two places like, then? I presume there’s a terrible lack of pavement?

  • Mannivu@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    The real issue is that you’re using Google Maps and Google Maps is notoriously bad when creating pedestrian or bike routes. For those cases you should use a router that’s based on OpenStreetMap since OSM’s database it’s way better when dealing with foot and bike infrastructure. The same route using an OSM based router gives a perfectly fine walkable route.

    Walkable route between two location in New Castle, Delaware