But knowing humanity it would be a spectacle

Now if you’re from Poland that would make it absolutely perfect

I see. I’m fairly new to this, obviously. Appreciate the context.

Very interesting, saving this as I’m planning to migrate to Immich too but I’m still in the uhemm… conceptual phase…

One question not really related to the core of your post: is running Immich in a VM inside a VM fine in terms of performance? I seem to remember somewhere someone saying that something as resource intensive as Immich would be severely hindered in a VE

The stack is Proxmox running […] a Debain VM. The Debian VM runs docker where Immich runs.

That’s where her spooky skeleton is supposed to be no? Inside?

Reality is that in places with less room for cars and street design and/or regulations disincentivizing driving, fewer people own cars than in places that have widened roads for car traffic and turned 1/3 of land area into surface parking. Your idea that car ownership is god-given and without space, people will get them either way and stack them on top of each other is delusional. How can San Antonio have a more than 10 times higher car owner rate than Hong Kong? They both have roughly the same GDP per capita. Did Hongkongers just not get the memo? Are they stupid?! Sure, they’d have nowhere to park and the whole island would constantly be gridlocked if they had the 90% car owner rate of San Antonio but none of that matters and they should get a car either way, as nature intended.

Little to no restrictions on who could buy, where one can drive, park a car were - and this is the last time I’m reiterating the same point because I know you just pretend not to get it - a choice. A deliberate choice made by thousands of cities around the globe, influenced by auto and oil industries. Cities were totally different before and have often been bulldozed specifically for that choice. And the other way around is perceivable too: once cities stopped deliberately choosing car-centric design, they were able to gradually stop being like that. See Paris post 2015, Amsterdam post 1980s. Both of which could not be had it been a necessity. Because it never was, it was deliberately decided to be this way.

No idea what the benefit is of deliberately misinterpreting such an obvious point. What caused the thing in the picture wasn’t a necessity.

This is kind of like the “you won’t have a calculator with you all the time” argument by your 8th grade math teacher in 2003, except instead of making yourself dependent on a little solar powered device (that you could have with you all the time if you really wanted to, even before smartphones) you’re becoming dependent on a subscription service offered by a trillion dollar company that can increase the price tenfold at will, or cut you from the platform entirely, stripping you of all your professional expertise at once.

Ah yeah whatever. I was just trying to help you understand that comment you were clearly missing the point of.

An ugly design/aesthetic and a stupid type of car that doesn’t need to exist is something entirely different.

hire carpenter

they don’t want to fix my carpets

???