• quarkquasar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Cost is like, towards the end of the list of why I wouldn’t have kids. It’s certainly there, but number 1 would probably be something like “I would never forgive myself for bringing another life into this shitty world unsolicited”.

      • quarkquasar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well, if you could point out to me where I said I “have so much money”, that’d be great.

        Otherwise one of us is going to look like an idiot.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          if you can afford a child with minimal impact to your lifestyle, you are quite wealthy.

          childcare is like 2-3K a month, for that to not substantailly impact you, i would assume your take home is northwards of 10K+ a month, which means you’re making close to 200K+. which is often the income bracket at which having children is not a life-style altering choice.

          for most folks, having a kid is so expensive it completely alters their lifestyle because it removes like 30-50% of their income.

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              implying children aren’t a financial burden implies you’re wealthy.

              the original post says ‘cost’ and the other person goes ‘cost isn’t a reason for me’.

              so i go ‘ok how much do you make that cost isn’t a reason for you?’ because the legit reason for the vast majority of folks, is the cost. they can’t afford kids, so they don’t have them.