• destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Gosh it’s almost like you guys have a system encoded into your constitution specifically designed to fix that

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            The system encoded in the constitution is slavery. Literally concocted by enslavers to violently enforce their privilege.

          • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            What, exactly are you talking about that you think is “encoded” into our constitution to allow us to completely replace our government with a new government? I really can’t think of anything that fits that. You’re either talking about Article V, which allows for constitutional amendment (but that is NOT a system for fixing the a need for an entirely different government) or you’re talking about the 2nd Amendment (again, not what you’re talking about) and that would be a VERY different way of achieving those results. Either way, I’m confused about what you mean.

            Or are we just operating on different concepts of what the word “government” means in this context? FYI, when most Americans say, “new government” they mean an entirely new political system, not a change in administration. We would just say, “administration” for that.

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      It doesn’t really matter, if done properly, the return on investment would be absolutely massive.

    • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The ridiculous bullshit is that the Lakeshore Limited already goes from Chicago to New York, but hits its maximum speed of 180km/h on a few stretches of track in the east that Amtrak owns. It averages only about 60km/h for the whole trip. That’s because the freight companies don’t care to maintain their tracks for high speed, since freight service doesn’t need it.

      I’m still pissed at Pres. Biden threw the rail workers unions under the train, when he should’ve protected the economy by nationalizing the rails to establish leverage over the corporations, instead. It would have had so many knock-on benefits to the nation.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The rights of way already exist for the most part. The whole nation was built on railways. Most are just cargo only, and many have been converted to bike/foot paths.

      Alternatively, interstate highway rights of way could be used.