• thedarkfly@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    It had not occured to me until recently that all the big late Pleistocene fauna (like Ice Age animals) just lived alongside all animals still around today. Tens of thousands of year is nothing in terms of animal evolution.

    So the African wildcat was absolutely contemporary to saber toothed cats!

  • drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    3 months later: “Hello sabermaxxers, today I will talk to you about optimising your killer instinct and releasing your inner feral cave cat. On a tangent, black cats are inferior and I hate females.”

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not saying black cats are inferior per se, I’m just saying their natural habitat is the dumpster where they can thrive. This is common sense and people who deny it only do so to impress females. I love and respect females, they make my cat weiner go all spikey.

      • drolex@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I am not being political when I talk about this. Next: I receive Catdolf Hitler himself.

  • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    saber-toothed cats are actually an entirely different lineage from what are called conical-toothed cats, that diverged about 20 million years ago. all saber-toothed cats are extinct, and all extant cats are conical-toothed, and descended from conical-toothed ancestors; there are no living cats descended from saber-toothed cats

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      On one hand, I think that it’s fair to point out, and an interesting point.

      But…on the other hand, I also think that generally when people say “we did X”, they’re often including people who aren’t their direct ancestors. And the degree to which they do that is context-dependent. Though they probably aren’t going back anything like 20 million years, either, in any kind of common context.

      What’s our closest living relative?

      searches

      Looks like chimpanzees and bonobos, and our last common ancestor was maybe 5–13 million years back.

      I guess we would include 'em in “we” if someone was saying “we left the oceans”. But they aren’t gonna make the in-group for “we won that sports game last night”.

  • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If saber-tooth were so great, why did they go extinct?

    Obviously, they weren’t great enough to survive until now. They are far inferior to say sharks, crocodiles and yes, modern cats.

    • thedarkfly@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not that they were weak, it’s just that all their prey disappeared when humans showed up. Seeing natural selection as some kind of merit has flaws. If they evolved, they were well-adapted by definition. If they went extinct, the conditions that made them evolve changed.

  • dalekcaan@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Look, Whiskers told us you’ve been on a lot of weird forums lately and, well… we’re worried you’re turning into a mewgenicist.

  • Tiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    One cool thing is they think saber toothed tigers had a really strong family bond. They found evidence that hurt tigers were taken care of after they were hurt. Suggesting a strong family bond rather than a solitary life.