FishFace

Sissy fitness you say?

French orthography is way more coherent than English. From the spelling you can pretty much tell how a french word is pronounced. Not the other way around, sure, but that’s a damn sight better than English which manages neither.

Will anyone learn to be less vociferous with their AI accusations, or only be more vociferous with their dislike for AI and so to make more dubious accusations?

I saw a recent David Revoy comic that everyone here on Lemmy was accusing of being AI. Which is really tragic for someone who goes to such effort, is such a supporter of free software, and in my opinion has a style which is quite far from typical AI output.

“—cheeks.”

Oh, I had totally forgotten how it worked! I thought it was exactly that. Thanks for the correction

You have to understand that Zuck didn’t make threads to snag users who objected to him and to Facebook.

Do you mean curl | cat or do you really want to create a file called cat?

Also piping to cat seems redundant but malicious hosts can detect whether the request is getting redirected, using some clever trick, so it’s not.

Also, your chance of spotting something bad in a malicious script is probably quite small.

There are two big piles of groupthink here.

When you first learnt about xkcd, did you not S L O O O R P the entire back catalogue?

I guess when I did that there were A LOT fewer. Cuz I’m old.

Well, programming lessons taught in 2016 are still pretty much going to teach programming now, so it shouldn’t be too hard if you put your mind to it.

I have seen very little misogyny on the fediverse, and only block people who interact with me personally in an annoying way or who post the same shit (that I don’t like) a lot.

I bet that analogy sounded smart in their head

Declining birth rates are multi faceted and no-one has a complete explanation. They’re also declining in countries which are doing well, across all social strata but disproportionately along the wealthy, so your explanation is very clearly incomplete.

I don’t think this is really on-topic.

Often they will, but what about the circumstances where they haven’t? We’re talking about a bike-first country which still does this.

My whole point here is that pro-cycling rule-makers will try to make cycling work in various ways, but those ways do NOT include letting cyclists ride across junctions when there is crossing vehicle traffic. The bias the person above is talking about is not about traffic light rules; it’s about missing other bits of bike infrastructure. And if that infrastructure is missing it does not make it sensible or reasonable to break other rules as some kind of counterbalance.

Rules governing bike traffic are generally quite reasonable though. It’s not like the enlightened traffic planners in the Netherlands went “you know what, cyclists don’t have to obey red lights” for example. So I’m not seeing the biases you’re talking about, at least in this example.

Comparing running red lights to sleeping under bridges or steal for survival seems, at best, hyperbolic. In any case I don’t think that quote supports the view that the law is intentionally biased

And we can still encourage both to obey the rules! Amazing!